Forensic Archaeology In Natural Disasters And Mass Fatality Events

A catastrophe is an event that causes extensive disruption to a community or society, overwhelming its ability to cope, and involves profound loss to human beings, material assets, and economic or environmental damage. Such events may have natural or human origin, but when of broad dissemination, they often give rise to multiple deaths in many countries. Identifying the deceased serves to show respect for the dead and bring closure to the surviving relatives. Legal reasons, including criminal investigations, settling estates, and determining current marital status, may also require identification.

The definition of a “mass disaster” threshold varies between jurisdictions, ranging from 2 to 10 fatalities. In 2016, the International Criminal Police Organisation (INTERPOL) developed guidelines and protocols to standardise the process of victim identification following a mass disaster event. These are not binding but are recognised internationally by their 190 members.

Excavation procedure for mass fatality events

Understanding the stratigraphy of a mass fatality site – its layered composition – provides the basic background necessary to interpret the site’s formation and features. This information is essential for formulating effective strategies for searching and recovering remains. Stratigraphy is a part of geology that deals with the study of stratified or layered materials, organised in a chronological sequence. Such strata are the successive accumulation of various substances, generally. Burying artefacts of natural remains. The surfaces of contact between such layers are called interfaces, and they mark a specific event or period in the deposition process. These principles of stratification are ordered in such a regular and predictable manner that stratigraphy is, thus, the most invaluable technique for archaeological investigation.

Also Read: Comparative Skeletal Anatomy of Human and Non-Human – Forensic’s blog

All remains, whether human, personal or structural in nature, are found within a stratigraphic context. Investigators can establish the relative chronology of evidence by analysing its position with respect to other elements at the scene within these layers. Such information will help in recognising relevant strata for investigation, relative dating and ascertaining the sequence of events. This can keep evidence well preserved: for example, through the rapid deposition of collapsed structures or flood sediments. However, embedding evidence complicates its recovery. The buried materials could have been stabilised in specific environments, leading to slow decomposition; this could have preserved evidence for a relatively long period.

Techniques of Human Identification

1. Forensic anthropology: Forensic anthropologists meticulously examine skeletal remains to determine age, sex, stature, and other biological details, which can be crucial in establishing an individual’s identity. Moreover, they analyse trauma and perimortem injuries, providing insights into the circumstances and causes of death. This field combines principles of both anthropology and forensic science, enabling professionals to reconstruct the life history and experiences of the deceased based on physical evidence.

2. Odontology: Dental records can provide vital information that may lead to the identification of victims, especially in cases where the body is severely decomposed or damaged beyond recognition. Dentists meticulously compare the records with the remains to establish a perfect match, leveraging unique dental features such as restorations, fillings, and natural variations. This comparison is not only pivotal in forensic investigations but also underscores the importance of maintaining accurate dental records for every individual.

3. DNA Analysis: This is an exceptionally reliable method of identification, particularly in cases where other techniques prove inconclusive due to degradation or lack of sufficient evidence. Samples can be obtained from bones, teeth, and soft tissues, and advancements in technology have significantly improved the ability to analyse minute quantities of DNA. This powerful tool can link an individual to a crime scene or establish familial relationships, thus playing a critical role in the justice system.

Read More: Ancient DNA: how do you extract it? – Forensic’s blog

4. Fingerprinting: This technique, although often challenging due to the effects of decomposition, remains a vital forensic tool, as fingerprints can potentially be recovered and compared against comprehensive databases. The uniqueness of each individual’s fingerprint makes this method invaluable; however, the process requires skilled forensic experts who can navigate the intricate nuances of analysing poorly preserved prints. Advances in technology have aided such recoveries, enhancing the field’s capacity to identify unknown individuals.

5. Isotope analysis: Analysing bones and teeth may reveal their isotopic composition, providing significant information about the victims’ geographic origin and dietary habits. By examining specific isotopes present in the remains, forensic scientists can draw conclusions about where the individual lived and what they consumed during their lifetime, thereby contributing critical context to the identification process. This approach not only helps identify victims but also sheds light on their lifestyle, environmental background, and potential social networks.

Evidence collection and preservation

1. Contextual analysis: Recording the exact location and position of remains and associated artefacts is crucial as it helps to understand the circumstances of death, shedding light on the events leading up to the individual’s demise and potentially revealing any foul play involved.

2. Personal effects: The recovery of personal effects, such as jewellery, clothing, and medical implants, can offer vital information that leads to identification, while also providing insights into the deceased’s personal history and social circumstances, thus establishing a more straightforward narrative of their life.

3. Taphonomic analysis: examining the condition of the remains alongside that of the ambient environment can provide significant information regarding the post-mortem interval and the conditions surrounding burial, helping forensic experts determine how long the individual has been deceased and what factors may have influenced the preservation of the remains.

4. Analysis of soil and sediment samples may offer insights into the burial environment, revealing details about the conditions and potential presence of evidence, which can be instrumental in piecing together the broader context of the case. On the other hand, trace evidence—such as hair, fibres, and pollen—can be utilised to recreate activities that link victims to specific locations, enhancing the overall understanding of their last movements and interactions before death.

Mass Grave Management and Coordination

1. Data management: The backbone of coordination is supplemented by a well-established and robust database system for managing information on victims, remains, and evidence. This not only ensures that data is systematically organised but also facilitates seamless accessibility for all stakeholders involved. This database enables efficient tracking of cases, comprehensive documentation of findings, and the ability to cross-reference information across various disciplines.

2. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Forensic archaeologists, anthropologists, odontologists, geneticists, pathologists, and law enforcement researchers combine their diverse expertise to make mass grave management successful; their collaborative efforts are pivotal in piecing together the fragmented stories of the deceased, ensuring that each individual is treated with dignity and their identities are accurately restored. This integrated approach allows for the sharing of innovative techniques, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the recovery process.

3. Ethical considerations: Above all, respect should be shown to the deceased and their concerned families, acknowledging their profound loss and the need for sensitive handling of the remains. Ethical guidelines should be adhered to in all aspects of recovery and identification, emphasising the necessity for transparency and compassionate communication with the families throughout the process. This commitment to ethics not only helps build trust but also upholds the dignity of all those affected.

4. Psychological support: In view of the emotional connotations of the work involved, psychological support for team members working in the management of mass graves is of vital importance; it is essential to provide regular mental health check-ins and counselling services to help cope with the distressing nature of their work. By fostering a supportive environment, organisations can ensure that their teams remain resilient, thereby sustaining their well-being and effectiveness throughout the recovery efforts.

Challenges and Limitations

1. Decomposition: Many mass graves are in an advanced stage of decomposition, which can make identification very difficult, often leaving forensic teams with only fragments of skeletal remains or deteriorated tissue.

2. Mass casualty incidents: The sheer number of victims arising from such mass graves can be totally overwhelming in terms of resources and expertise, requiring extensive coordination among local authorities, forensic specialists, and international organisations to manage the recovery effectively.

3. Climatic factors: The recovery process may be impeded by adverse weather conditions, terrain, and even contamination. Heavy rains can wash away evidence, while rugged landscapes can delay access to the sites, complicating the efforts of recovery teams.

4. Ethical dilemmas: There is a need to find a balance between conducting scientific investigations and showing respect for the dead and their families. This is rather challenging, as families often seek closure, while the complexities of legal and ethical considerations demand careful deliberation during the recovery and identification process.

Conclusion

Identification of victims in mass fatality incidents is a very complex process that requires multitasking from a number of different experts. Forensic archaeology, anthropology, odontology, genetics, pathology, and law enforcement researchers each contribute in essential ways to the recovery, analysis, and identification of human remains. Challenges such as decomposition, mass casualty incidents, climatic factors, and ethical dilemmas may hinder the identification process. On the other hand, rapidly changing technology and collaboration among multidisciplinary experts significantly improve our ability to bring closure to families and provide justice for the victims of such tragedies.

References

• Gursky E.A., Fierro M.F. Death in large numbers: the science, policy, and management of mass fatality events. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2012. 491 p.
• Mundorff A. Integrating forensic anthropology into Disaster victim Identification. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012. Jun; 8(2): 131-9. PMID: 2188297. 10.1007/s12024-011-9275-0.
• Saul F., Mather Saul J. Hard evidence: case studies in forensic anthropology. 1sr ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; c2003. Chapter 20, Planes, trains, and fireworks: the evolving role of the forensic anthropologist in mass fatality incidents; p. 266-77.

Authored By

Read More