Predicting Future Crimes: The Role of the PCL-R in Risk Assessment

Introduction

Several researchers and clinicians have devoted considerable time and effort to pinpoint the risk factors that could enhance the accuracy of evaluating risk and dangerousness. Certain specific personality traits and disorders have been identified as notable risk factors for recurring and persistent criminal behaviour. Through these different studies, certain personality traits and disorders have emerged as significant predictors of an individual’s likelihood to engage in repetitive and chronic criminal activity. Understanding these risk factors is crucial for improving the accuracy of risk assessments and developing more effective intervention strategies.

Psychopathy as a Predictor of Recidivism

In particular, Psychopathy is one of the important personality traits that is considered to be a strong predictor of recidivism. Psychopathy is characterized by “a persistent disregard for social norms and conventions, impulsivity, unreliability, irresponsibility, lack of empathy, remorse, and emotional depth, and failure to maintain an enduring attachment to people, principles, and goals.”

Psychopaths have a disproportionately significant impact at nearly every stage of the criminal justice system. Despite representing approximately 1% of the general male adult population, they constitute between 15% and 25% of the male inmates in North American prisons. This means that psychopaths are 15 to 25 times more likely to engage in criminal activities, thus resulting in higher imprisonment compared to non-psychopaths. No other factor correlates as strongly with incarceration as psychopathy. For instance, substance abuse, a major focus of correctional systems, is the next most significant variable. Although a significant majority (65% to 85%) of incarcerated individuals have a history of substance abuse, only about 8% of the general U.S. population suffers from such issues. Consequently, while having a substance abuse problem increases the likelihood of imprisonment by around nine times, the correlation for psychopathy is much higher, ranging between 15 and 25 times more likely.

Also Read: Role of Cognitive Neuroscience in Forensic Psychology

Psychopathy and Violent Crimes

When examining violent crimes specifically, psychopathy remains a highly predictive factor. While 62% of the general male prison population consists of violent offenders, this figure rises to 78% among imprisoned psychopaths. Moreover, the threat posed by psychopaths extends beyond general criminality to particularly alarming statistics involving law enforcement. One study revealed that over 50% of police officers killed in the line of duty are murdered by psychopaths. Interestingly, while criminal behaviour generally tends to decline with age, this trend is not as pronounced among psychopaths, particularly those committing violent crimes, including sexual violence. For these individuals, the tendency to engage in both sexual and nonsexual violence diminishes very little with advancing age, underscoring the persistent and enduring nature of their threat to society.

Forensic Risk Assessment

Forensic risk assessment has gained significant attention in the criminal justice system in recent years. The use of risk assessment tools can sometimes clash with the interests of the individual being assessed, especially when these tools influence decisions about whether someone stays detained after their sentence ends. Typically, the assumption is that the person will be released, but if the tool suggests a high risk of violence, detention might be prolonged.

Benefits of Risk Assessment Tools

However, in some cases, applying a risk assessment tool could actually benefit the person who is being assessed. There are at least three ways in which a risk assessment could help the individual. First, the risk assessment might identify treatments or interventions that could help the individual. Second, it could speed up their release from detention. For example, if someone is up for discharge from a secure psychiatric facility but is facing denial due to a perceived risk of violence, this tool might provide evidence to support their release. Third, even if the assessment leads to extended detention, it could still be beneficial. This is because staying detained could prevent future offences.

The Role of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)

An important component of this field is the evaluation of psychopathy since studies have shown that elevated scores on the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) are consistently linked to higher rates of criminal recidivism. Various studies have confirmed the strong predictive power of the PCL-R and its predecessor, the PCL, in forecasting general criminal recidivism. This is particularly true for violent recidivism, as supported by additional research. When used as a screening tool to predict aggressive behaviour in psychiatric hospitals, the PCL-R demonstrated the most significant predictive effect. Even after accounting for previous offences and demographic variables, the PCL-R consistently proved effective in predicting violent recidivism.

PCL-R and Violent Recidivism

High PCL-R scores are also linked to a greater likelihood of violent and sexual reoffending among sex offenders. Additionally, individuals with psychotic disorders who score highly on the PCL-R are at an increased risk of future violent behaviour. These findings highlight the importance of psychopathy assessment in forensic risk evaluations. They also provide valuable insights into potential recidivism and help in the management and rehabilitation of offenders.

Structure and Scoring of the PCL-R

The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) is an important tool in assessing psychopathy in adults. This scale offers a comprehensive measure of different psychopathic traits. PCL-R originated from an early 22-item scale that was developed by Hare in 1980. The PCL-R is now a refined version of the previous scale that consists of 20 items. This scale evaluates individuals based on specific psychopathic characteristics. Each item is rated on a 3-point scale: 0 indicates that the trait does not apply, 1 indicates partial applicability, and 2 indicates full applicability. The scores range from 0 to 40.

Administration of the PCL-R

The PCL-R is administered using a semi-structured interview. However, in cases where interviews cannot be conducted, the assessment relies completely only on information obtained through the case file.

Facets and Factors of the PCL-R

The items of the PCL-R are categorized into four facets, which are further grouped into two broad factors. Factor 1 includes the interpersonal and affective features of psychopathy. This includes traits such as glibness or superficial charm, grandiose or sense of self-worth, pathological lying, and conning and manipulative behaviour. Factor 2 includes chronic antisocial lifestyle behaviours. It includes factors such as lack of remorse or guilt, shallow affect, lack of empathy or being callous, and failure to accept responsibility. Research indicates that Factor 2 is an essential predictor of different kinds of recidivism outcomes. On the other hand, Factor 1, which includes interpersonal and affective facets, is a weaker predictor of recidivism. However, in certain high-risk violent offender populations, the affective facet has shown predictive accuracy for violent outcomes, particularly the callous-unemotional traits.

Conclusion

The PCL-R not only provides dimensional scores but is also used to classify individuals for research and clinical purposes. Overall, the PCL-R is a comprehensive and robust instrument. It offers insights into the multifaceted nature of psychopathy and supports both clinical assessments and research endeavours in understanding and managing psychopathic behaviour.

References

1. Colins OF, Andershed H, Pardini DA. Psychopathic traits as predictors of future criminality, intimate partner aggression, and substance use in young adult men. Law Hum Behav. 2015 Dec;39(6):547-58. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000148. Epub 2015 Aug 24. PMID: 26301710; PMCID: PMC4673026.
2. Douglas T, Pugh J, Singh I, Savulescu J, Fazel S. Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data. Eur Psychiatry. 2017 May;42:134-137. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 28. PMID: 28371726; PMCID: PMC5408162.
3. Grann M, Långström N, Tengström A, Kullgren G. Psychopathy (PCL-R) predicts violent recidivism among criminal offenders with personality disorders in Sweden. Law Hum Behav. 1999 Apr;23(2):205-17. doi: 10.1023/a:1022372902241. PMID: 10333757.
4. Hare, R. D. (2016). Psychopathy, the PCL-R, and criminal justice: Some new findings and current issues. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 57(1), 21–34. doi:10.1037/cap0000041
5. Hemphill, James & Hare, Robert & Wong, Stephen. (2011). Psychopathy and Recidivism: A Review. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 3. 139. 10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00355.x.
6. Kiehl KA, Hoffman MB. THE CRIMINAL PSYCHOPATH: HISTORY, NEUROSCIENCE, TREATMENT, AND ECONOMICS. Jurimetrics. 2011 Summer;51:355-397. PMID: 24944437; PMCID: PMC4059069.
7. Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2015). Short- and long-term recidivism prediction of the PCL-R and the effects of age: A 24-year follow-up. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 6(1), 97–105. doi:10.1037/per0000095

Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)

1. What is the primary focus of research on psychopathy in relation to criminal behaviour?

1. Identifying the social environments of offenders
2. Determining risk factors that enhance the accuracy of risk assessments
3. Understanding the judicial process
4. Evaluating rehabilitation programs

Answer: B) Determining risk factors that enhance the accuracy of risk assessments

2. Which personality trait is considered a strong predictor of recidivism?

1. Narcissism
2. Psychopathy
3. Borderline Personality Disorder
4. Antisocial personality traits

Answer: B) Psychopathy

3. What percentage of the general male adult population is estimated to be psychopaths?

1. 5%
2. 10%
3. 1%
4. 15%

Answer: C) 1%

4. Among imprisoned individuals, what percentage is identified as psychopaths?

1. 5% – 10%
2. 15% – 25%
3. 30% – 40%
4. 50% – 60%

Answer: B) 15% – 25%

5. Which factor correlates most strongly with incarceration?

1. Substance abuse
2. Prior convictions
3. Psychopathy
4. Age

Answer: C) Psychopathy

6. What is the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) used for?

1. To diagnose schizophrenia
2. To assess psychopathy in adults
3. To evaluate drug addiction
4. To predict IQ levels

Answer: B) To assess psychopathy in adults

7. What are the two broad factors of the PCL-R?

1. Emotional and Cognitive
2. Interpersonal and Affective; Antisocial Lifestyle
3. Delinquent and Non-delinquent
4. Violent and Non-violent

Answer: B) Interpersonal and Affective; Antisocial Lifestyle

8. What does a high score on the PCL-R generally indicate?

1. Higher likelihood of rehabilitation
2. Increased risk of violent and sexual reoffending
3. Decreased chance of criminal behaviour
4. Low intelligence level

Answer: B) Increased risk of violent and sexual reoffending

9. According to studies, how does age affect violent behaviour in psychopaths?

1. It significantly decreases with age
2. It diminishes very little with advancing age
3. It increases with age
4. It remains unchanged

Answer: B) It diminishes very little with advancing age

10. What benefit can a risk assessment tool provide to an individual in a forensic setting?

1. Guaranteeing discharge from detention
2. Identifying relevant treatments or interventions
3. Reducing their likelihood of incarceration
4. None of the above

Answer: B) Identifying relevant treatments or interventions

Authored by